http://blog.till-westermayer.de/index.php/2007/12/04/google-regulieren-statt-wikipedia-schlagen/ Das Blog von Till Westermayer -- seit 2002 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:41:38 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://blog.till-westermayer.de/index.php/2007/12/04/google-regulieren-statt-wikipedia-schlagen/comment-page-1/#comment-22412 iPhone Taschen Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:03:05 +0000 http://blog.till-westermayer.de/index.php/2007/12/04/google-regulieren-statt-wikipedia-schlagen/#comment-22412 Sehe ich genauso. Man sollte liber mal etwas gegen den Monoploisten tun anstatt gegen eine Seite die freies Wissen für alle zur Verfügung stellt. Sehe ich genauso. Man sollte liber mal etwas gegen den Monoploisten tun anstatt gegen eine Seite die freies Wissen für alle zur Verfügung stellt.

]]> http://blog.till-westermayer.de/index.php/2007/12/04/google-regulieren-statt-wikipedia-schlagen/comment-page-1/#comment-11011 Google-Wikipedia-Connection and the decay of academia « Jakoblog — Das Weblog von Jakob Voß Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:49:57 +0000 http://blog.till-westermayer.de/index.php/2007/12/04/google-regulieren-statt-wikipedia-schlagen/#comment-11011 [...] Mathias pointed [de] me to a lengthy and partly ridiculous “Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google” by Hermann Maurer [de] (professor at the IICM, Graz) and various co-authors, among them Stefan Weber, whose book [de], I already wrote about [de]. Weber is known as well as Debora Weber-Wulff for detecting plagiarism in academia - a growing problem with the rise of Google and Wikipedia as Weber points out. But in the current study he (and/or his colleauges) produced so much nonsense that I could not let it uncommented. The study tries to prove a “Google-Wikipedia connection (GWC)”-conspiracy about Wikipedia and Google working together for the bad of us all. Sounds like Daniel Brandt but this is a serious study! I am less interested in the called “Google-Wikipedia connection” (Till Westermayer did better in his posting, see also Jürgen Lübeck [both de]) but on the wrong conclusions the study draws from it: When people google key terms, they need no brain effort to do research: everybody can type a word or a phrase into a search engine (in former times, one needed basic knowledge about the organisation of a library and the way a keyword catalogue operates, and one needed to work with the so-called “snowball system” to find new fitting literature in the reference lists of already found literature). So there is a clear shift in the field of research towards a research without brains. [...] […] Mathias pointed [de] me to a lengthy and partly ridiculous “Report on dangers and opportunities posed by large search engines, particularly Google” by Hermann Maurer [de] (professor at the IICM, Graz) and various co-authors, among them Stefan Weber, whose book [de], I already wrote about [de]. Weber is known as well as Debora Weber-Wulff for detecting plagiarism in academia – a growing problem with the rise of Google and Wikipedia as Weber points out. But in the current study he (and/or his colleauges) produced so much nonsense that I could not let it uncommented. The study tries to prove a “Google-Wikipedia connection (GWC)”-conspiracy about Wikipedia and Google working together for the bad of us all. Sounds like Daniel Brandt but this is a serious study! I am less interested in the called “Google-Wikipedia connection” (Till Westermayer did better in his posting, see also Jürgen Lübeck [both de]) but on the wrong conclusions the study draws from it: When people google key terms, they need no brain effort to do research: everybody can type a word or a phrase into a search engine (in former times, one needed basic knowledge about the organisation of a library and the way a keyword catalogue operates, and one needed to work with the so-called “snowball system” to find new fitting literature in the reference lists of already found literature). So there is a clear shift in the field of research towards a research without brains. […]

]]> http://blog.till-westermayer.de/index.php/2007/12/04/google-regulieren-statt-wikipedia-schlagen/comment-page-1/#comment-10803 Benedikt Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:42:08 +0000 http://blog.till-westermayer.de/index.php/2007/12/04/google-regulieren-statt-wikipedia-schlagen/#comment-10803 "von Cory Doctorow" - hey, du nennst ja den Namen des Autors. Damit widersprichst du aber dem in dem Dokument beschriebenen "Copyleft paradigm" der "net logic", das auf dem Unscharf-Werden der Referenzierungssysteme basiert ;-) »von Cory Doctorow« – hey, du nennst ja den Namen des Autors. Damit widersprichst du aber dem in dem Dokument beschriebenen »Copyleft paradigm« der »net logic«, das auf dem Unscharf-Werden der Referenzierungssysteme basiert ;-)

]]>